Freenet or die

If more people would participate. They can use the Internet.

2 notes

SPLENDA: THE LETHAL SCIENCE OF A POISONOUS CHLOROCARBON
In test animals Splenda produced swollen livers, as do all chlorocarbon  poisons, and also calcified the kidneys of test animals in toxicity  studies. The brain and nervous system are highly subject to metabolic  toxicities and solvency damages by these chemicals. Their high solvency  attacks the human nervous system and many other body systems including  genetics and the immune function. Thus, chlorocarbon poisoning can cause  cancer, birth defects, and immune system destruction. These are well  known effects of Dioxin and PCBs which are known deadly chlorocarbons.”
“Synthetic chemical sweeteners are generally unsafe for human  consumption. This toxin was given the chemical name “sucralose” which is  a play on the technical name of natural sugar, sucrose. One is not the  other. One is food, the other is toxic; don’t be deceived.”



As of 2006, only six human trials have been published on Splenda  (sucralose). Of these six trials, only two of the trials were completed  and published before the FDA approved sucralose for human consumption.  The two published trials had a grand total of 36 total human subjects. Thirty six people sure doesn’t sound like many, but wait, it gets worse, only  23 total were actually given sucralose for testing and here is the real  killer: the longest trial at this time had lasted only four days and looked  at sucralose in relation to tooth decay, not human tolerance.

There have been no long-term human toxicity studies published until after the FDA approved sucralose for human consumption. Following FDA  approval a human toxicity trial was conducted, but lasted only three  months, hardly the length of time most Splenda users plan to consume  sucralose. No studies have ever been done on children or pregnant women.

Much of the controversy surrounding Splenda does not focus just on  its safety, but rather on its false advertising claims. The competition  among sweeteners is anything but sweet. The sugar industry is currently  suing McNeil Nutritionals for implying that Splenda is a natural form of  sugar with no calories.
FDA fails again.

SPLENDA: THE LETHAL SCIENCE OF A POISONOUS CHLOROCARBON

In test animals Splenda produced swollen livers, as do all chlorocarbon poisons, and also calcified the kidneys of test animals in toxicity studies. The brain and nervous system are highly subject to metabolic toxicities and solvency damages by these chemicals. Their high solvency attacks the human nervous system and many other body systems including genetics and the immune function. Thus, chlorocarbon poisoning can cause cancer, birth defects, and immune system destruction. These are well known effects of Dioxin and PCBs which are known deadly chlorocarbons.”

“Synthetic chemical sweeteners are generally unsafe for human consumption. This toxin was given the chemical name “sucralose” which is a play on the technical name of natural sugar, sucrose. One is not the other. One is food, the other is toxic; don’t be deceived.”

As of 2006, only six human trials have been published on Splenda (sucralose). Of these six trials, only two of the trials were completed and published before the FDA approved sucralose for human consumption. The two published trials had a grand total of 36 total human subjects. Thirty six people sure doesn’t sound like many, but wait, it gets worse, only 23 total were actually given sucralose for testing and here is the real killer: the longest trial at this time had lasted only four days and looked at sucralose in relation to tooth decay, not human tolerance.

There have been no long-term human toxicity studies published until after the FDA approved sucralose for human consumption. Following FDA approval a human toxicity trial was conducted, but lasted only three months, hardly the length of time most Splenda users plan to consume sucralose. No studies have ever been done on children or pregnant women.

Much of the controversy surrounding Splenda does not focus just on its safety, but rather on its false advertising claims. The competition among sweeteners is anything but sweet. The sugar industry is currently suing McNeil Nutritionals for implying that Splenda is a natural form of sugar with no calories.

FDA fails again.

Filed under splenda chloronation popison fda big pharma corporate cocksuckers

  1. mikeo56 posted this